Slow websites
When important pages take too long to open, interactions respond slowly or elements shift during loading, especially on a phone.
Clear for search. Comfortable for people.
We identify technical obstacles that stop your website from loading, working properly or being accessible to search engines. We turn findings into priorities: what to fix first, which changes to implement and how to compare the results.
When important pages take too long to open, interactions respond slowly or elements shift during loading, especially on a phone.
When pages are missing from search, duplicated or affected by URL errors and unclear structure, and need a technical review.
Before a redesign, migration or platform change, when important URLs, content and the existing technical configuration need to be considered.
We begin with measurements and available context. Findings refer to specific pages and journeys, and changes follow the agreed priorities.
We review representative pages, resource loading and technical responses. With access, we include Search Console and analytics data rather than relying on a single score.
We analyse robots, sitemaps, canonical URLs, redirects, errors and duplicates. We clarify which pages should be searchable and which serve an internal purpose.
We check headings, descriptions, internal links and page semantics. Where appropriate, we add structured data that reflects the actual visible content.
We identify heavy images, unnecessary scripts, font issues and layout shifts. Resource optimisation, loading and caching changes are agreed around the site’s architecture.
We implement the agreed changes or prepare specific tasks for your team. After updates, we check navigation, forms and important functionality.
We compare results under documented measurement conditions and explain what changed. Resolved issues are separated from work that remains.
We clarify the problems, important pages, change history and available data. We agree on an audit alone or an audit with implementation.
We collect technical findings and describe causes and dependencies. Tasks are prioritised by user impact, urgency and complexity.
We start with the agreed issues, check the effect on important journeys and record the changes so they can be evaluated.
We repeat the relevant checks and explain the results and remaining limitations. We define next steps without promising immediate traffic growth.
An audit and implementation can be commissioned separately. Scope depends on site size, template count, code access and the issues found. After diagnosis, we agree on the changes and estimate instead of making a broad promise about unknown work.
If some materials are not ready yet, we can start with your goal and work through the rest together.
No. Rankings depend on many factors, including content, competition and search engine behaviour. Technical optimisation removes specific obstacles, but cannot guarantee a ranking or a volume of traffic.
A score helps identify issues, but does not describe the entire experience. We consider testing conditions, the behaviour of key pages and available real-user data. Target criteria are agreed for your project.
This service covers the technical work: audits, structure, indexing and performance. Content strategy, regular publishing and off-site promotion need a separate scope. We define the boundaries before starting.
Technical changes can be checked after implementation. Search data updates and traffic changes need observation and have no guaranteed date. Our report separates completed fixes from metrics that still need monitoring.
Tell us what you want to change or create. You’ve chosen SEO & Performance — we’ll clarify the details and propose a scope of work.
qodevra@gmail.com